Well I think this might be specifically me.
What they don’t get is that had Stephen Shing been a bug eyed green skinned alien I would have given him a chance.
I have a disability, I would not dream of using my disability as a weapon against others. This would make me feel ashamed of mysself.
It’s politics, if the Conservative party can’t make a case to the country good enough to be given an overall majority then the only way left is to work with other parties. If the price is electoral reform and other political reforms also banking reforms and tax reforms then that price has to be paid.
Perhaps the Conservatives will make that case, there are 10 days to go, anything can happen yet. After all who but party insiders would have predicted Clegg
First of all I don’t think that if he used compliments to gain a self-serving favour or advantage from another which is the wikipedia definition of sycophant that if would work in the context of the election. I’ve done loads of canvassing previously, it just doesn’t work that way.
Secondly I have to say that Nick is a Liberal Democrat, that means that in most situations he gets shouted down and talked over, think of the outrageous behaviour in the House of Commons at PMQ’s. By definition he has to have developed a very thick skin. We say what needs to be said, we take a position and plough on to the conclusion.
Ray Ingram writes to the Herald on Friday 16th of April
Ray appeared in Stephen Shing’s’ election literature during the Parish/District election of 2007 and has supported him by giving him preferential coverage in the Neighbourhood Watch Leaflets (neighbourhood watch example on this site)
Here he makes himself out to be impartial.
This was in todays (Saturday 17th April) Argus
Well I can’t think why I’d be blogging about this!
It’s a wonder they didn’t see it coming four years ago and expell the councillor then.
What a shower.
I was just watching Sky News it was no suprise that Mr Gove misrepresented the Lib Dems position on the nuclear deterent, just to be clear, we intend not to get rid of it but to replace Trident by an alternative system which does not cost as much
Yes….. But then again why is this such an issue for us? I don’t wish to be calous. The Poles obviously have had a tragedy. Does this reflect on our Prime ministerial candidates ability to sympathise? Is this really relevant?
The SNP leader apparantly doesn’t think there should be cuts according to the interview on Radio 4 I heard this morning. He has no prospect of implementing policy so he can afford to carp on the sidelines, he thinks.
Really this shouldn’t even be an issue now, we should have already implemented it.
The fact that we haven’t is of course dangerous because the further away from the crash we get the more the view that we shouldn’t do anything becomes more prominent.
